By beating Fiorentina last year, Olympiakos became the first Greek side to win a European club trophy.
The report also noted the perceived benefits of the internet among the tribe, including the ability to alert authorities to health issues and environmental destruction and stay in touch with faraway family.The lawsuit claims other news outlets sensationalised the NYT's report, including a headline from TMZ referencing porn addiction.
The response led the NYT to run aaround a week after its original story, with the headline: "No, A Remote Amazon Tribe Did Not Get Addicted to Porn".The report said "more than 100 websites around the world" had "published headlines that falsely claim the Marubo have become addicted to porn".
But the lawsuit claimed the NYT's original story had "portrayed the Marubo people as a community unable to handle basic exposure to the internet, highlighting allegations that their youth had become consumed by pornography".The named plaintiffs, community leader Enoque Marubo and Brazillian activist Flora Dutra, who helped to distribute the 20 $15,000 Starlink antennas to the tribe, said the NYT story helped fuel "a global media storm", according to the Courthouse News Service.
This, they said, subjected them to "humiliation, harassment and irreparable harm to their reputations and safety".
The TMZ story included video footage of Marubo and Dutra distributing the antennas, which they said "created the unmistakable impression [they] had introduced harmful, sexually explicit material into the community and facilitated the alleged moral and social decay".The boy's mother described his release as "a miracle", adding that the weeks he had been in captivity had been "horrible, a nightmare".
Many dissident rebel groups such as the Frente Jaime Martínez finance themselves through extortion and kidnappings for ransom, as well as drug trafficking.The commander of the regional police force, Brigadier General Carlos Oviedo, said the boy's stepfather had been the real target of the kidnappers, but that they had seized the boy when they found that the stepfather was not at home.
The stepfather, a local merchant, told local media that he was not involved in any illicit business and said he did not know why he had been targeted.It is not clear if a ransom was paid for the boy's release.